Has the Bosnian pyramid been recorded in the cave art of Chauvet?

I ask this as an open minded question due to certain things that have connected. Like everything, I try to stay open to all possibilities and look at things from all angles.. just in case there is that one little thing that makes all the difference.

Earlier, it was announced that the Bosnian pyramid has been dated at 29,000 years old. So, yes, it seems it was constructed sometime around the same period that the Chauvet cave art was created. As soon as I heard this news, I began to check the cave art.

I am in need of a cartographer to help me confirm exactly everything that I have found, but as I have said before, I am sure there is a map drawn into the art but it has been drawn in such a way as to confuse. As soon as I opened the image I needed I noticed that there is a triangle painted on a level line at the very top of the section.

Although that image above is rather grainy and seems to have been through some form of editing process, the same triangle is apparent on other higher quality images of the same loctaion but have not been photographed at such close proximity. Original photos would be of great advantage to determine this correctly, so this is why I look at it all from a ‘possible’ rather than a ‘confirmed’.

For example, here is another image of the same location in higher quality but with the defect of being taken from a greater distance. This image has been cropped from the original and enlarged to help explain exactly what I am saying. The object in question is in the middle of the back of the upper lion. It will be more obvious in the next set of examples

Here, the adventure begins.

My first job was to confirm that the location of this triangle was as correct as the cave artists would allow. It is clear to me that they have used many methods with which to hide, obscure or mask certain points of interest. Going on my original idea that this is a map, i had to determine exactly, to the best of my current ability, how much of a map it is. What I am finding is very interesting, should I be correct..

Of course, you are more than able to go and check everything I have done here but remember we have to allow for artistic expression and any methods used to disguise things.

One important point is that this map looks as though it is in several pieces and layers. It seems to be that there are different points in time that are being displayed, or a far deeper knowledge of their surroundings than we could ever give them credit for.

In this example we see several coloured lines representing different coastlines. I will work from the bottom right and move left, then upwards roughly towards the centre.

The lower red line moves down the coastline to, what is, current day Egypt, then it follows a line that is now submerged, as you will see in the google earth map example. This red line then meets up with a green line that curves its way northwards. This too is also following a lower sea level which gives us the impression of Italy being a landbridge to North Africa. There does appear to be a body of water trapped in the middle (to the left of the first green line) that looks like an inverted V, to the other side of that is the rest of the landbridge.

Moving back to the first green line we see two blue lines. The vertical one is the important one here. If we look at google earth we can see that there is a ridge in the exact same position under the sea. The other blue line is suggestive of the same but it also seems to tie in with an ancient coastline that is seen as another green line directly above it. That there is just one of the examples as to how the art can sometimes get lost in itself, but I feel it is intentional. They wanted to hint and suggest things, but also did not want to make it too easy for others to learn what is really in the art.

Then we head further north to the yellow line which is more representative of the area that contains modern day Greece. Follow that yellow line up and we come to a brown line which seems to follow a mountain range in what is now Southern France and way over to the first red circle which is the rough area of where the Chauve cave can be found.

Finally, at the very top in the upper red circle we see the triangle, or pyramid. Going only on what I can see from my observations, it does look as though this is the region that contains the Bosnian pyramid.

Here is a Google Earth map with the same coloured lines to help guide you to exactly where I am going with the above. (The vertical blue line is white for obvious reasons)

There is another set of lines that converge in the art that I am sure have an important part to play in this set but, like everything else, I need to find that connection which has so far eluded me. There are other markings nearby to the pyramid that MIGHT be suggestive of something else nearby of importance. That, too, is for future research.

Has the Bosnian pyramid been recorded in the cave art of Chauvet?